Well, now I'm a performed playwright! This past Sunday, May 6, my One Act dystopia play Cull premiered at a special
members-only New Writing triple bill at the Oast Theatre in Tonbridge, Kent. It depicts a future where
resources are at critical, overpopulation is the dominant and our government must consider a 'terminal
option' for the crisis.
Directed by Sandra Barfield (funny
thing about this: I had sent this off two years earlier,
and they just
got back to me in March. Stranger things indeed... but I'm not
complaining!), it closed off an afternoon of new plays (following both a
ten minute and One Act comedy about infidelity and Brexit
respectively).
It
was a fun experience: naturally, I was nervous about seeing my work
performed live in front of an audience. All the expected concerns came
up: is it exciting? Is it clever? Is it unsettling? Did the director get
it? Did the actors get it? Was the dialogue right? Was the pacing
right? Were the characters will fleshed out? Did their conflict make
sense? Was it too long? Was it too short possibly? Was it practical?
However,
all went off without a hitch and the response from the audience was
very positive. Many were indeed unsettled by the ethical questions posed
by the play, and my own observations of the audience confirmed this.
So,
what next? All goes well and it recieves the winning decision in
October by the Oast's board, there may be full follow-up productions on
the fringe festival circuit around England. After that, well, skies the
limit, no? I have also been offered to have any 10 minute plays produced
by another theatre as a result, so I will keeping an eye on that. If
there is a moral to this story, it's expect the unexpected.
(Check out Oast's newest productions here: https://www.oasttheatre.com/)
Showing posts with label theatre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label theatre. Show all posts
Thursday, 10 May 2018
Friday, 22 April 2016
Writing For Musicals - A Workshop By A.C. Smith (17/4/16)
So on Sunday, finding not much of anything to occupy myself with, decided to attend a workshop dedicated to the craft of book and lyric writing at the Theatre Delicatessen in Farringdon. The session was taught by theatre veteran A.C. (Ali) Smith, who has worked on a number of shows with hr biggest credit being a co-book writer on the West End production of the hit comedy musical Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, based on the much loved Frank Oz film.
The workshop was broken in two halves: first half was on the book/libretto, which is the backbone of the show that ties the songs together in a narrative. A book writer differs from a playwright, despite both working on the stage, in that musicals are a collaborative effort over the singular vision of a normal play, and thus a writer has to be conscious of far more elements and people than they would if they were writing a regular piece. It can also be a thankless job, as most praise for musicals tend to go on the songs and performances moreso than the libretto (shows like CATS and We Will Rock You have often had their narratives questioned, yet are still very popular because of the music.). The upside is that it encourages a writer to be much tighter in their plotting and pacing, getting from song to song while creating stakes and a journey worth going on with our characters (usually one or two, as multiple characters tend to lean towards revues).
An effective book, Smith explained, was divided into two main lists: the 'keys' and the 'stages', both self explanatory. Five keys in fact:
Structures can vary, though the standard (from a writer's perspective), are a three (covered this one many times before in the blog, so I won't reiterate) and a five act (i.e., something like tragedy, where the first two setup our lead, his/her wants and how he 'gets' what he/she wants, while the last three show his fall). But wait, you say, most musicals are played in two! That's more for commercial reasons instead of narrative ones, and just means you may get a break at the end of 'Act One' i.e. act two in a three, or act two/three in a five, depending on your story.
The second half was devoted to lyrics which, believe it or not, don't necessarily require you to be a musician nor are they poetry with music. Lyrics are something that can be very infuriating at first, but as you get used to them and find your voice and style, they can become a second nature, and coupled with the many different types of 'texture' and 'flavours' words can have, there really is no wrong answer other than keeping it true to the character who is singing it (you wouldn't have a comedy relief singing something really profound and complicated) and not to cheat/go overboard with rhyming. It is important not to confuse rhyming with what is called 'Identity' i.e. Shaped/Shape, Fuse/Confused, where the words almost but do not sound similar. You can also create connections with vowels and even just the melodies of a song.
As with books, Smith outlined six rules of lyrics:
And with that, our time sadly drew to a close. I must say, this was rather fun and a most welcome change of pace! Great atmosphere, friendly people and plenty of helpful tips. The fact is, I have loved musicals all of my life, from the Disney Renaissance gems like Aladdin and Lion King, to many beloved screen and stage classics like Singin' In The Rain and Victor Victoria. I just love the ability of music, especially musical theatre, to inform, inspire and of course, create laughter. I enjoy the sight of a smiling audience, engrossed in whatever my work happens to be, and I had long been interested into expanding int musicals. I even tried to make my last University short film a musical! I felt the workshop was thorough and most helpful, though I lament we didn't get to do exercises in lyric writing as I would've liked to try and out what we had learnt to use. Oh well.
The workshop was broken in two halves: first half was on the book/libretto, which is the backbone of the show that ties the songs together in a narrative. A book writer differs from a playwright, despite both working on the stage, in that musicals are a collaborative effort over the singular vision of a normal play, and thus a writer has to be conscious of far more elements and people than they would if they were writing a regular piece. It can also be a thankless job, as most praise for musicals tend to go on the songs and performances moreso than the libretto (shows like CATS and We Will Rock You have often had their narratives questioned, yet are still very popular because of the music.). The upside is that it encourages a writer to be much tighter in their plotting and pacing, getting from song to song while creating stakes and a journey worth going on with our characters (usually one or two, as multiple characters tend to lean towards revues).
An effective book, Smith explained, was divided into two main lists: the 'keys' and the 'stages', both self explanatory. Five keys in fact:
- Vivid, charismatic characters worth following. Who are they and what do they want?
- Tighter plotting.
- Dramatic action with weight and purpose. Songs play an important role here, propelling narrative and characters forward.
- Imaginative world building, transporting an audience.
- Elements of comedy and drama/light and shadow to create balance.
- Outline
- Expand
- Condense
Structures can vary, though the standard (from a writer's perspective), are a three (covered this one many times before in the blog, so I won't reiterate) and a five act (i.e., something like tragedy, where the first two setup our lead, his/her wants and how he 'gets' what he/she wants, while the last three show his fall). But wait, you say, most musicals are played in two! That's more for commercial reasons instead of narrative ones, and just means you may get a break at the end of 'Act One' i.e. act two in a three, or act two/three in a five, depending on your story.
The second half was devoted to lyrics which, believe it or not, don't necessarily require you to be a musician nor are they poetry with music. Lyrics are something that can be very infuriating at first, but as you get used to them and find your voice and style, they can become a second nature, and coupled with the many different types of 'texture' and 'flavours' words can have, there really is no wrong answer other than keeping it true to the character who is singing it (you wouldn't have a comedy relief singing something really profound and complicated) and not to cheat/go overboard with rhyming. It is important not to confuse rhyming with what is called 'Identity' i.e. Shaped/Shape, Fuse/Confused, where the words almost but do not sound similar. You can also create connections with vowels and even just the melodies of a song.
As with books, Smith outlined six rules of lyrics:
- Character first: it has to fit them, as stated above.
- Hook/motif: What is the heart of the song/unites it, and what makes it catchy?
- Structure: How does its shape affect its meaning? A standard formula goes A, A, B, A, which translates to Introduction, Expansion, Contrast and Return.
- Rhyme: Usually, second and fourth line. Good to consult rhyming dictionaries and thesauruses if ever in trouble.
- Scansion: words set the way one would speak them so as to flow better in song.
- Singability: don't give a singer an impossible chore to sing. Simplicity is key, and complexity must be used sparingly and for a purpose.
And with that, our time sadly drew to a close. I must say, this was rather fun and a most welcome change of pace! Great atmosphere, friendly people and plenty of helpful tips. The fact is, I have loved musicals all of my life, from the Disney Renaissance gems like Aladdin and Lion King, to many beloved screen and stage classics like Singin' In The Rain and Victor Victoria. I just love the ability of music, especially musical theatre, to inform, inspire and of course, create laughter. I enjoy the sight of a smiling audience, engrossed in whatever my work happens to be, and I had long been interested into expanding int musicals. I even tried to make my last University short film a musical! I felt the workshop was thorough and most helpful, though I lament we didn't get to do exercises in lyric writing as I would've liked to try and out what we had learnt to use. Oh well.
Friday, 8 August 2014
Summer work experience - Production Assistant on Flowers in the Field (June 2014) and Revolution Farm (August 2014) - (8/8/14)
During this summer, I had the great blessing and privilege to work as a production assistant on two small theatre productions, both directed by tutors from my Middlesex BA Film course. These were the above mentioned Flowers in the Field, a period piece set during WW1, directed by David Cottis, and Revolution Farm, an update of George Orwell's classic novel Animal Farm, directed by James Martin Charlton.
Both were relatively similar in how I came to work on them, and then the type of working relationship and tasks I was given; both had announced their new shows via social media, so I promptly emailed both and asked if there were available position on the production team, regardless of pay. Both men were very prompt in their reply, and were very easy to work with and allowing. So, after a little discussion and checking over of schedules, I was signed up as an extra Production Assistant, and had a meet with the main body of the team, the principal person of note here being the designer; Joana Dias for Flowers, and Ian Teague for Farm. It was with these people who I was to chiefly collaborate with.
However, it was from this point that the two diverge, equally due to different subject matter, as well as the actual length of my collaboration; Flowers was a period piece, so my task was primarily to assist in the acquistion of props, many of them from the actual period and rather fragile, as well as set construction. What's more, my collaboration was for the full month that made up rehearsals. Farm however, was contemporary, so there was more in the way of gathering materials up to build props, such as cardboard for the placcards that advocate the rules of the farm. The catch here, however, was the timing; I only served on this one for a week, as it happened to begin around the time I was preparing to depart for Spain to visit relatives and sort out private affairs there. A shame, as I found that between the two, I found Farm more actively utilizing me as a member of the team, whereas Flowers, while very interesting given the material, definitely felt a tad more like a runaround catch-fest, chasing down after all of the antiquated props need for the show, with one particular escapade having me leave for Portsmouth on a Sunday to get ahold of some 150 year old music cylinders!
However, I cannot deny that on each occasion, the people have been absolutely lovely, and very welcoming towards a newcomer like myself. Also, it was a great insight into the worlds of fringe and community theatre, and how even these grassroots, low budget production can have just as bells and whistles as their West End big brothers. I wish to extend a considerable thanks to both David and James for giving me these opportunities to help beef up my CV, and I hope we bump into each other sometime soon.
Both were relatively similar in how I came to work on them, and then the type of working relationship and tasks I was given; both had announced their new shows via social media, so I promptly emailed both and asked if there were available position on the production team, regardless of pay. Both men were very prompt in their reply, and were very easy to work with and allowing. So, after a little discussion and checking over of schedules, I was signed up as an extra Production Assistant, and had a meet with the main body of the team, the principal person of note here being the designer; Joana Dias for Flowers, and Ian Teague for Farm. It was with these people who I was to chiefly collaborate with.
However, it was from this point that the two diverge, equally due to different subject matter, as well as the actual length of my collaboration; Flowers was a period piece, so my task was primarily to assist in the acquistion of props, many of them from the actual period and rather fragile, as well as set construction. What's more, my collaboration was for the full month that made up rehearsals. Farm however, was contemporary, so there was more in the way of gathering materials up to build props, such as cardboard for the placcards that advocate the rules of the farm. The catch here, however, was the timing; I only served on this one for a week, as it happened to begin around the time I was preparing to depart for Spain to visit relatives and sort out private affairs there. A shame, as I found that between the two, I found Farm more actively utilizing me as a member of the team, whereas Flowers, while very interesting given the material, definitely felt a tad more like a runaround catch-fest, chasing down after all of the antiquated props need for the show, with one particular escapade having me leave for Portsmouth on a Sunday to get ahold of some 150 year old music cylinders!
However, I cannot deny that on each occasion, the people have been absolutely lovely, and very welcoming towards a newcomer like myself. Also, it was a great insight into the worlds of fringe and community theatre, and how even these grassroots, low budget production can have just as bells and whistles as their West End big brothers. I wish to extend a considerable thanks to both David and James for giving me these opportunities to help beef up my CV, and I hope we bump into each other sometime soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







